Wednesday, May 30, 2012
Thursday, May 3, 2012
We want “your” wealth… NOW!
"Redistribution of wealth." How is that going to be decided as to who gets what? For example if "redistribution of wealth" happens and I use the share to out run everybody and I end up with a much larger portion, would that mean that somebody could come along and just take it away? Not trying to be a smart arse here, I want to understand what "redistribution of the wealth" really means, because history has shown human nature to always shine thru. I have said it before, I say again. Read Animal Farm and understand the lessons from the book.
So if I said I had a million dollars would I be viewed as a bad person? Would I not be allowed to control the million dollars?
How about this logic… I have a hundred dollars you have nothing, to be fair I should give you fifty. OK, now I turn a corner I have fifty dollars. Next person has none. To be fair I give the next person twenty five dollars. I turn a corner… See where this is going?
So when I am faced with having none. Am I to expect somebody to walk along and hand me fifty dollars as I did a few people ago? Would they admit to having the hundred dollars in the first place? Perhaps in a perfect world. I suspect that human nature overrides everything in the world we reside in. Again I ask what is the logic and reasons behind the term “redistribution of wealth”? Sounds like envy to me. Not much respect for those who envy.
However if you’re truly a firm believer in this notion please feel sorry for me and contact me privately so we can exchange information. Then you can distribute your earnings to me. I will feel better taking away your guilty feelings of having wealth. I promise I will use it for a worthy cause.
Furthermore… If the logic is currently that the banks that are the subject of attacks due to their vast wealth, why is nobody targeting the churches? They’re tax exempt? The logic of busting the banks windows because they represent wealth leads one to conclude that the churches of this nation are next, does it not? (Pay heed to the lessons of 1930’s Germany. Pay heed to the lessons of Soviet Russia)
The churches own property they discriminate as to who they are going to help. Why are the churches of this nation not a target of property damage? When are the hooded masked radicals going to start attacking the institution know as religion? Don’t think it can happen? Don’t think it will happen? Read your history. Read about revolutions and/ or political takeovers and look at the patterns thru out history.
Today’s hooded masked vandals are tomorrows so called grown ups. They want your wealth, and they want it now. They seem to have no problem making that point clear. Beware young revolutionaries beware of the children you are teaching, they one day will most likely turn on you. It’s simply in their nature.
©2012
All rights reserved
Chris J Hutchins
Dog Hair Productions
So if I said I had a million dollars would I be viewed as a bad person? Would I not be allowed to control the million dollars?
How about this logic… I have a hundred dollars you have nothing, to be fair I should give you fifty. OK, now I turn a corner I have fifty dollars. Next person has none. To be fair I give the next person twenty five dollars. I turn a corner… See where this is going?
So when I am faced with having none. Am I to expect somebody to walk along and hand me fifty dollars as I did a few people ago? Would they admit to having the hundred dollars in the first place? Perhaps in a perfect world. I suspect that human nature overrides everything in the world we reside in. Again I ask what is the logic and reasons behind the term “redistribution of wealth”? Sounds like envy to me. Not much respect for those who envy.
However if you’re truly a firm believer in this notion please feel sorry for me and contact me privately so we can exchange information. Then you can distribute your earnings to me. I will feel better taking away your guilty feelings of having wealth. I promise I will use it for a worthy cause.
Furthermore… If the logic is currently that the banks that are the subject of attacks due to their vast wealth, why is nobody targeting the churches? They’re tax exempt? The logic of busting the banks windows because they represent wealth leads one to conclude that the churches of this nation are next, does it not? (Pay heed to the lessons of 1930’s Germany. Pay heed to the lessons of Soviet Russia)
The churches own property they discriminate as to who they are going to help. Why are the churches of this nation not a target of property damage? When are the hooded masked radicals going to start attacking the institution know as religion? Don’t think it can happen? Don’t think it will happen? Read your history. Read about revolutions and/ or political takeovers and look at the patterns thru out history.
Today’s hooded masked vandals are tomorrows so called grown ups. They want your wealth, and they want it now. They seem to have no problem making that point clear. Beware young revolutionaries beware of the children you are teaching, they one day will most likely turn on you. It’s simply in their nature.
©2012
All rights reserved
Chris J Hutchins
Dog Hair Productions
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
